Need indicators
This capability is usually relevant when these signals appear in the operating environment.
Phishing simulation sends a controlled message or landing page and follows observed behavior with relevant training. The platform measures reporting or interaction under policy and compares results with a comparable follow-up exercise. The goal is better recognition and reporting, not collecting passwords or ranking individuals.
Employee phishing simulation connects security awareness measurement with phishing reporting training rather than interpreting clicks in isolation.
An awareness team simulates a fake invoice, delivers targeted training, and measures reporting again in a follow-up campaign.
The simulation and awareness training technology is a specialized security system used to test and measure the level of consciousness of users about the attack and social engineering, while providing interactive training based on real-world scenarios.
The technology is based on creating simulation campaigns and training exercises using e-mails, landing pages, text messages and educational modules, then tracking users' interaction and analyzing their behavior while dealing with different scenarios.
This technology helps companies know how ready their employees are to deal with the missions of phishing and social engineering before human errors turn into security incidents.
Instead of just relying on theoretical training, realistic and secure scenarios that simulate real attacks are sent via e-mail, text messages or landing pages, and then the user's interaction with these scenarios is measured and their behavior is analyzed.
Cyber Security teams also help build process-based measurement and analysis awareness programs instead of relying on general assumptions.
The technology works within the corporate environments that rely on e-mail, users and regulatory guidelines.
This capability is usually relevant when these signals appear in the operating environment.
Core capabilities that turn the requirement into practical controls.
The impact security teams and leadership can expect from the right implementation.
Feature availability depends on product version, target systems, deployment, and integrations.
Recreate realistic messages within an authorized exercise and measure responses without using real credentials.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Create a training email suited to the team’s context rather than using one template for every role.
Design a simulation page around the behavior being measured without requesting real secrets.
Test responses to simulated text messages in an authorized campaign with a clear reporting channel.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Use a prebuilt template to model a relevant phishing pattern, then adapt the message and scenario to the campaign rules.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Configure behavior for the use case and retain the approved configuration for review or rollback.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Apply explicit allow or block criteria; test an allowed and a denied example before rollout.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Identify a supported operating or managed platform; verify version, enrollment, and available policies.
Record an open signal without treating it as conclusive evidence that the recipient read the message.
Record interactions with simulated links while accounting for automatic visits by mail scanners.
Record that a submission occurred without storing passwords or sensitive field values in the report.
Identify replies to simulated messages to guide training on sender verification.
Measure interaction with an authorized exercise and interpret it in campaign context, not as a judgment of an employee.
Present reviewable results to compare changes and identify cases requiring action.
Measure interaction with an authorized exercise and interpret it in campaign context, not as a judgment of an employee.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Inspect a sample in the supported scope and compare the signals with both normal and unusual activity.
Present reviewable results to compare changes and identify cases requiring action.
Measure interaction with an authorized exercise and interpret it in campaign context, not as a judgment of an employee.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Record what happened, when, and in which scope; review event fields and retention for investigation and audit.
Configure behavior for the use case and retain the approved configuration for review or rollback.
Run the scenario within an authorized scope and compare interaction and reporting before and after coaching.
Measure interaction with an authorized exercise and interpret it in campaign context, not as a judgment of an employee.
Address suspicious messages or behavior according to the solution’s role and review legitimate cases to reduce false positives.
The technology is based on creating messages, landing pages and text messages that simulate real-world phishing methods in order to test the behavior of users in a safe environment.
The technology tracks the opening of messages, clicks, and sends data and answers, while analyzing the results to determine the level of risk and human weaknesses.
The technology provides direct training during simulation or after interaction with different scenarios to clarify tracking indicators and how to detect them.
The technology supports repeated campaigns and regular exercises to measure the development of security awareness over time.
The technology enables targeting specific groups such as leaders, new employees or remote workers according to the risk level.
The technology provides reports and information panels that help cybersecurity teams track user performance and analyze risk indicators continuously.
The technology records all activities related to campaigns and exercises to support security review and audit.
Agree campaign goals, channels, collected data, and who can view results. Do not collect real passwords during the exercise.
Illustrative ways to support control implementation. An area may have more than one example; each row is not necessarily a separate official control.
| Domain or control | How it supports implementation | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Information and training program in cybersecurity | Support recurring awareness programs on phishing, safe email practices, social engineering, and emerging risks. Related capability: Simulation campaigns, interactive exercises and educational units | Applied |
| Safe handling of e-mail and mail services | Offers real-world phishing scenarios and training to discover them Related capability: Fighting messages and patterns based on real attacks | Applied |
| Safe use of social media | Includes templates linked to social media within the awareness scenarios Related capability: Social media abuse patterns | Applied |
| Training according to functional responsibilities | It allows targeting different groups such as leaders, remote workers and new employees. Related capability: Group management and dedicated targeting | Applied |
| Email protection | Supports increased user awareness of the risks of e-mail-related trafficking Related capability: Simulating the phishing messages and tracking interaction | Applied |
| records and monitoring. | Provides records and reports about opening messages, clicks, sending data and answers Related capability: Tracking, reports and information panels | Applied |
| Incident and threat management | Provide training data and behavioral indicators that help assess the exposure to attacks Related capability: Risk reports and user behavior analysis | Applied |
| Periodic review and audit | Provide full audit of system activities and reports that can be used in the review of awareness programs Related capability: Full audit and detailed reports | Applied |
| Domain or control | How it supports implementation | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness of Cyber Security | The technology supports the implementation of periodic awareness programs targeting the user’s behavior toward catch and social engineering, in accordance with the requirements for the spread of security awareness culture within the institution Related capability: Simulation campaigns and interactive exercises | Applied |
| Measurement of safety awareness effectiveness | Measures how users interact with phishing simulations, including message opens, clicks, submitted data and responses, to help assess awareness training. Related capability: Behavioral Tracking and Detailed Reports | Applied |
| Security training | The technology supports training users to discover the attempts of catch and social engineering through educational units and practices based on real-world scenarios Related capability: Educational units and training | Applied |
| Training of target groups according to risk | The technology enables targeting different groups within the organization, such as leaders, new employees and remote workers, supporting training according to risk level. Related capability: Group management and dedicated targeting | Applied |
| Human Risk Management | The technology helps identify users or groups that are most susceptible to the risk of phishing, supporting understanding of human behavior-related risks. Settings or logs can help prepare evidence. Governance decisions and effectiveness testing remain with the organization. Related capability: Information and risk reports | Applied |
| Security Monitoring | The technology provides continuous monitoring of users’ behavior during simulation and exercise campaigns, supporting high-risk behavioral patterns detection Related capability: Monitoring opening, click, sending and responses | Applied |
| Events and records. | The technology records users’ activities, campaign and exercise results, supporting feedback to records and analysis of awareness and simulation results. Related capability: Activity records and reports | Applied |
| Incident and threat management | The technology supports human preparedness for the threats of catch and social engineering by simulating real-world scenarios and analysing behavioral responses to them. Related capability: Simulation and user response analysis | Applied |
| compliance and audit | The technology provides full audit of the system activities and detailed reports that can be used to review the implementation of security awareness programs and measure compliance. Settings or logs can help prepare evidence. Governance decisions and effectiveness testing remain with the organization. Related capability: Full audit and detailed reports | Applied |
| Security Governance | Technology supports security awareness programs that the framework requires adoption, implementation and measurement of their effectiveness within the security governance practices Settings or logs can help prepare evidence. Governance decisions and effectiveness testing remain with the organization. Related capability: Information, training and measurement reports | Applied |
| Protection of sensitive financial systems | This technology supports the reduction of the risk of phishing and social engineering that may target users related to financial systems and services, through training, simulation and behavioral measurement. Related capability: Targeted phishing simulations and behavior-based training | Applied |
Evaluate these examples against the facility level and assets in scope. They do not authorize IT/OT connectivity or component installation on operational assets without assessment.
| Domain or control | How it supports implementation | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Information and training program for cybersecurity in operating environments | Supports individual training on the risks of phishing and social engineering within security awareness programs Related capability: Exercises, educational units and instant training | Applied |
| records and monitoring. | Provide monitoring of user behavior during hacking campaigns such as opening, click, sending data and responses Related capability: Tracking behavior, information and reports | Applied |
| Incident and threat management | Support human preparation exercises by simulating social attacks Related capability: Simulation of phishing and risk reports | Applied |
| Physical Security and Social Engineering Simulation | Supports implementation and training of social engineering scenarios Related capability: Social Engineering and Interactive Training Scenarios | Applied |
| Visibility and monitoring | Provide an analytical view of the employees’ behavior towards fraud messages and attempts Related capability: Information and Immediate Statistics | Applied |
“Applied” describes the capability in the illustrative example, not an implementation or compliance status for the customer.
Decision questions
Start with the risk signals on this page. If they match your environment, they can be turned into a short assessment that defines scope, priority, and a practical implementation approach.
Start with a focused risk and scope assessment, then define implementation priorities, technical requirements, and phased rollout steps.
Email Security
Reduce phishing, malicious attachments, and risky links before they reach users.
Explore solutionDMARC
Reduce domain spoofing and improve email trust through SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.
Explore solutionCompliance
Translate control requirements into gaps, policies, priorities, and a measurable implementation roadmap.
Explore solutionReady for the next step?
Share your use case and priority systems so we can discuss a pilot and its integration requirements.