Need indicators
This capability is usually relevant when these signals appear in the operating environment.
An API security gateway is a shared enforcement point between consumers and backend services. It can validate client identity and tokens, check request shape, or enforce consumption limits before routing. Record-level access and transaction logic remain backend responsibilities where the gateway lacks that context.
An API security gateway can combine OpenAPI schema validation with API rate limiting before routing; the service still authorizes each operation.
A partner application joins an enterprise API. The team tests accepted and rejected requests at the gateway and checks what authorization the application must enforce itself.
These capabilities describe this layer within the integrated protection architecture. Availability depends on the licensed components and integrations.
Validate request checks, authorization, and consumption policies on the selected gateway. Object-level authorization remains an application responsibility where required.
This capability is usually relevant when these signals appear in the operating environment.
Core capabilities that turn the requirement into practical controls.
The impact security teams and leadership can expect from the right implementation.
Feature availability depends on product version, target systems, deployment, and integrations.
Inspect a sample in the supported scope and compare the signals with both normal and unusual activity.
Normalize requests before gateway inspection, and test that the upstream service interprets the relevant request components consistently.
Test the scenario that triggers protection and a similar legitimate case to tune false positives.
Compare request structure with the agreed API contract before forwarding it; test unexpected fields.
Combine relevant detection signals and review blocking impact on legitimate traffic before production.
Limit request rates by client or route to protect the service without blocking normal use.
Gateway controls limit abusive requests within available capacity; volumetric floods may need upstream protection.
Distinguish suspicious automation from normal traffic and test exceptions for legitimate integrations.
Combine relevant detection signals and review blocking impact on legitimate traffic before production.
Receive connections in front of the service, then apply policy before forwarding requests.
Terminate TLS at the gateway for inspection and define how the connection to the application is protected.
Check certificate revocation status and validate connection behavior when status lookup is unavailable.
Integrate certificate enrollment or renewal with a compatible issuer; test authorization, renewal, and revocation.
Integrate key operations with hardware protection where supported and review key export restrictions.
Expose or rewrite service paths or content and verify that expected application behavior is preserved.
Send covered content to an external inspection service and define gateway behavior if the service is unavailable.
Identify both integration endpoints and the data they exchange; verify behavior if either endpoint is unavailable.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Turn organizational requirements into testable settings and define who may approve exceptions.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Verify token signature, issuer, audience, and expiry before accepting the request.
Federate sign-in through an identity provider; validate token issuer, audience, and expiry.
Associate users or groups with authorized scope and review how membership changes affect access.
Send structured events to monitoring and verify that key fields arrive with the event time and asset context.
Send supported files or content for inspection before routing and define gateway behavior if inspection is unavailable.
Identify which request signals feed the fraud integration and what happens when no decision is available.
Integrate key operations with hardware protection where supported and review key export restrictions.
Send structured events to monitoring and verify that key fields arrive with the event time and asset context.
Record what happened, when, and in which scope; review event fields and retention for investigation and audit.
Send structured events to monitoring and verify that key fields arrive with the event time and asset context.
Show activity within the covered scope and associate events with an asset or session during review.
Show activity within the covered scope and associate events with an asset or session during review.
Present reviewable results to compare changes and identify cases requiring action.
Show activity within the covered scope and associate events with an asset or session during review.
Reduce disruption from a component failure; test actual failover and recovery to normal operation.
Distribute traffic across endpoints; verify session behavior and removal of unhealthy targets.
Detect an unhealthy target so traffic is withheld until it is ready again.
Confirm environment requirements, supported versions, and dependencies before moving the configuration to production.
Confirm environment requirements, supported versions, and dependencies before moving the configuration to production.
Confirm environment requirements, supported versions, and dependencies before moving the configuration to production.
Confirm environment requirements, supported versions, and dependencies before moving the configuration to production.
Review proposed rules against legitimate traffic before enforcement; automation alone is not a reason to approve them.
Test rules against representative traffic before production and define rollback if unintended impact appears.
Connect defined actions or data to other systems; review authorization, authentication, and failure handling.
Validate request checks, authorization, and consumption policies on the selected gateway. Object-level authorization remains an application responsibility where required.
Illustrative ways to support control implementation. An area may have more than one example; each row is not necessarily a separate official control.
| Domain or control | How it supports implementation | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Security of web applications. | The protective layer provides web applications and APIs, with HTTP(S) requests checking and communication security verification. Related capability: Web Application Protection Wall, APIs Protection, HTTPS/TLS | Applied |
| Events records and monitoring | Provide organized records, access statistics, tracking panels, and link to monitoring and analysis systems Related capability: JSON records, tracking panels, SIEM integration, Common Event Format | Applied |
| Cryptography | Support communication encryption, certificate verification and integration with key management units Related capability: TLS; OCSP; HSM integration; URL encryption | Applied |
| Cyber flexibility and continuity of business | Supports high availability, burden balance, and backup failure mechanisms Test failure and recovery paths. This capability does not replace a complete continuity or recovery plan. Related capability: High availability; failover; load balancing; health checks | Applied |
Evaluate these examples against the facility level and assets in scope. They do not authorize IT/OT connectivity or component installation on operational assets without assessment.
| Domain or control | How it supports implementation | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility and monitoring | Provide organized records, tracking panels, access statistics, and link to monitoring and analysis systems Related capability: logging; dashboards; SIEM integration | Applied |
| Access control | Supports access control, standard login registration, and verification of characteristics when integrated Use only authorized paths and assets. Network isolation and remote-access approval requirements still apply. Related capability: access control; Single Sign-On; JWT; JWKS | Applied |
| Protection of Protocols | Supports verification of HTTP(S) protocols and verification of JSON and OpenAPI schemes Related capability: protocol validation; OpenAPI enforcement | Applied |
| Incident response | Supports the collection and connection of records and events with security analysis and monitoring systems Verify asset compatibility and test operational impact before deploying an agent or taking response action in an OT environment. Related capability: structured logs; SIEM; Common Event Format | Applied |
| Protection of industrial environments | Supports the protection of web applications and APIs used within industrial environments or between connectivity zones Related capability: WAF; API gateway | Applied |
“Applied” describes the capability in the illustrative example, not an implementation or compliance status for the customer.
Decision questions
Start with the risk signals on this page. If they match your environment, they can be turned into a short assessment that defines scope, priority, and a practical implementation approach.
Start with a focused risk and scope assessment, then define implementation priorities, technical requirements, and phased rollout steps.
CIAM
Govern how customers, partners, and external users access digital services.
Explore solutionWAAP
Extend application protection to APIs, bots, and abuse scenarios.
Explore solutionMicrogateway
Apply protection controls close to microservices and sensitive internal integrations.
Explore solutionReady for the next step?
Share your use case and priority systems so we can discuss a pilot and its integration requirements.